daily emancipation
between hope and despair, we exist.
between hope and despair, we exist.
Last week I gave notice to JP. Quickly alerted those who needed to know, and listened as those who were resistant to the change talk about their sadness at the news. Both were relatively easy to handle. What has been hard is dealing with myself.
I am surprised by how much venom i’m expelling, and how quickly. After bearing witness to the daily disappointments and tragedies of life in the hood, I have lost interest. And unlike those who have no choice but to continue in the daily grind, i am taking advantage of what i have to exit. its tiring- being in the middle of a tragic soap opera every day. its no wonder the police, and citizens of the neighborhood are so damn haggard all the time. this place will suck you dry.
I wonder how the experience is different for those who grew up in this environment- re they simply jaded earlier, but to the same effect, of do they not even notice the tragedy? or perhaps they dont recognize their tragedy or tiredness, thus making it null?
for the first time, when people say things to me like ” i dont know how you do this, it takes so much energy”, i dont roll my eyes at their weak mindedness, i shake my head in agreement and reply ” i know.”
i am disappointed in the glacial pace that change takes, and the young people are so directionless…and in the moment, while i am angry, i also realize that this is not the young peoples fault- they are only part of the equation. this is the responsibility of people who are now somewhere between 30 and 50 years old. The parents- who used drugs, hit their children, refused help, and were also sent to the margins. thier offspring- the young people i work with are the byproduct of someone elses life choices and circumstances. but what scares me? reproduction.
so where are the other people on Tumblr who are thinking about child welfare?
few and far between it seems.
a search for “DCFS” brought up a lot of links to “DCF” posts ( not related at all)
a search for “child welfare” brought up posts from around the country, mostly reposting updates on legislative changes
a search for ” north lawndale” brought up my posts. and some random other stuff.
and last night, at an improv show, when we were asked to throw out suggestions for themes, i was tempted to yell out things like “group home” and “social worker” but didn’t, because my mom was there, and I didn’t want to make her feel bad.
its funny how much this means to me, and how little it means to the rest of the world, proportionately.

I’ <!— /* Font Definitions */ @font-face {font-family:”Times New Roman”; panose-1:0 2 2 6 3 5 4 5 2 3; mso-font-charset:0; mso-generic-font-family:auto; mso-font-pitch:variable; mso-font-signature:50331648 0 0 0 1 0;} /* Style Definitions */ p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal {mso-style-parent:”“; margin:0in; margin-bottom:.0001pt; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:12.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”;} a:link, span.MsoHyperlink {color:blue; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed {color:purple; text-decoration:underline; text-underline:single;} p {margin-right:0in; mso-margin-top-alt:auto; mso-margin-bottom-alt:auto; margin-left:0in; mso-pagination:widow-orphan; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:Times;} table.MsoNormalTable {mso-style-parent:”“; font-size:10.0pt; font-family:”Times New Roman”;} @page Section1 {size:8.5in 11.0in; margin:1.0in 1.25in 1.0in 1.25in; mso-header-margin:.5in; mso-footer-margin:.5in; mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 {page:Section1;} —> ve spent 2 days in a DCFS mandated training on involving fathers in the lives of the children in the system. We began by calling out stereotypes that come to mind around the word ” father”- manipulative, drug dealer, abusive, disinterested, unaccountable…so on and so forth. The trainers went on to explain that our bias against father is why we don’t work harder to engage them, to the detriment of the children.
This made me uncomfortable. Because threes a really big piece of this theory missing; DCFS is a system that takes a disproportionate amount of children of color. Therefore the fathers that we deal with are going to be disproportionately men of color.
I don’t have the numbers in front of me so I’ll conservatively say that 85 percent of DCFS cases are families of color. Which leaves 15 percent as white. This is nearly an exact inverse proportion on the POC/ White proportion in the city of Chicago. hmmmm?
Right. So here we are serving 85 percent of families that are from a race that only represents 15 percent of the city. Which means that when DCFS workers use the aforementioned words to describe fathers, they’re really describing black men/fathers.
In nearly the same language uses in media to portray this it set of men. Black men, at least in this case are struggling in a battle that is Sisyphean in magnitude.
How the hell are we supposed to et a group of people who are walking into a room full of people who already think the worst to show up?
And furthermore- I realized some serious flaws in how JP is handling this issue. Since our youth do not have the goal to “return home” but to have “independence” we have nearly no contact with the family. It seems to be an uneasy truce in most cases. The guys are trusted to make their own decisions about visiting and being with family, and we encourage them to go home whenever possible, but we do not reach out to invite parents inside our home. Either way there are two points to be made with this…well, three.
1) We are perpetuating the message that fathers (and really, any parent) are unimportant by not doing more to encourage them to come around and participate in the decision-making process. I fear that a generational problem then crops up: if the message is sent that Tyrone’s dad is not important to Tyrone’s case/ progress/ critical decisions then Tyrone will internalize that, and when he becomes a father, he will then use this internalized message to guide himself away from his own children.
2) JP seems to thrive on keeping families at distance. We do not encourage the relationships, and instead offer our agency as a substitute- creating youth who are overly dependent on the system/ JP, with weakened family ties, and no confidence in the redemptive powers of enduring familial relationships.
3) I know for a fact (fuck you Chapin Hall, I didn’t need a billion dollar study to find out either) that kids who at least know where their parent is do better than those with no contact or knowledge of a parent or an adult relative who genuinely cares. To be clear ANY parent seems to improve things, but only CARING relatives seem to be able to provide what young folks need to stay a little more grounded. AND I also know that though the outcomes are not consistently better, and the cases are much more rare, it seems that having a father who has it together is exceptionally useful to easing a young person into a more positive outcome in life sooner.
So there you have it Chapin Hall, DCFS, McEwen…and all of you other goofballs lining too many pockets with “special” funds for “special” initiatives. By fostering healthy educated emotionally available Black fathers we are also insuring healthy educated and emotionally available Black children. All the DCFS workers in the world cannot do for a young man what a “good enough” father can.
If you have the time, Google “good enough mother” for info on D. Winnicott’s theory on.well here…(thanks again, wikipedia)
Winnicott’s treatment of psychically disturbed children and their mothers gave him the experience on which he built his most influential concepts, such as the “holding environment” so crucial to psychotherapy, and the “transitional object,” known to every parent as the “security blanket.” He had a major impact on object relations theory, particularly in his 1951 essay “Transitional Objects and Transitional Phenomena,” which focused on familiar, inanimate objects that children use to stave off anxiety during times of stress.
His theoretical writings emphasized empathy, imagination, and, in the words of philosopher Martha Nussbaum, who has been a proponent of his work, “the highly particular transactions that constitute love between two imperfect people.” A prime example of this is his ideal of the “good-enough mother,” the imperfectly attentive mother who does a better job than the “perfect” one who risks stifling her child’s development as a separate being.
I keep thinking about going back to school to get a PhD and study fatherhood, men, media…no one pays attention to fathers any more- women’s liberation was such a successful movement that we have rendered men absolutely unnecessary in our lives for anything other than breeding. As a woman, I get a certain thrill from knowing this…but I also get a certain sense of dismay at the prospect of generations of children raised with out a man around because of the ripples of women’s lib.
Now I’m rambling. Which is ok. I’ll be glad I have this to reference later when I’m ready to write my book.

as predicted, the GH is over. 60 days to find new homes for the kids, and then, they’re done. Not a suprise, at all. Heartbreaking; totally.
What does this mean for the TLP? nothing until we fail to pay our expenses. Theres just no way that we’re gonna have the cash on hand to deal with this.
honestly? i’m ready to call it a day. too much harm, and i cant help but wonder if it can ever be healed, or even restored. people are strong, and resilient, and sometimes, too smart to continue on.
but as i look elsewhere, ill also be paying close attention to the slow sinking of a multi- million dollar ship.
ahoy.

I’ve changed this past 18 months. My rose- colored glasses crushed upon impact. For over a year- I have advocated for those around me to see the gradual failure of those things we took for granted. Health failures, faith failures, trust failures. Each small failures holding in a life lesson inside- no one taking the time to talk about what it meant.
Now JP finds itself on the brink of closure. With a large maginifying glass, all of our errors, oversights, and imperfections are being reviewed. Oversight is not a problem, and neither is transparency. It is a porblem, when I’ve spent ayear warning that other people were going to ruin this agency- their immaturity, and blind faith in jesus, keeping them from fully understanding the weight of thier actions. And as a result, we all pay. I have never been so disgusted by good chirsitians as i am today. their lack of insight, lack of true ownership…weakness and dependence on a fictitious higher power…
and when it ends, i will sail away.